Get Ready: Mike Waltz Is About to Shake Up the Dysfunctional UN

President Trump’s nomination of Mike Waltz as the next U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations isn’t just a personnel change; it’s a declaration of intent. Waltz, a former Green Beret colonel and Florida congressman, brings a no-nonsense, America-first mindset to a body often criticized for undermining U.S. sovereignty. His selection signals a return to assertive diplomacy, prioritizing national interests over the globalist agendas that have long dominated Turtle Bay.

Waltz’s credentials are hard to dismiss. A decorated veteran with four Bronze Stars, he’s served as a counterterrorism advisor to Vice President Dick Cheney and shaped Afghanistan policy at the Pentagon. His time in Congress, particularly on the Armed Services and Foreign Affairs committees, cemented his reputation as a hawk on threats like China and Iran. This isn’t a diplomat who’ll sip tea and nod along to anti-American rhetoric; Waltz is poised to confront it head-on.

The United Nations, for all its lofty ideals, has become a stage for adversaries like Russia and China to push narratives that weaken the U.S. and its allies, especially Israel. Waltz’s nomination arrives at a pivotal moment, as the UN struggles with credibility amid stalled reforms and paralyzed responses to crises in Gaza and Ukraine. Trump’s choice reflects a belief that the U.S. must lead with strength, not acquiescence, in this fractured global arena.

Yet, the pick isn’t without controversy. Waltz’s recent exit as national security advisor, tied to a leaked Signal chat exposing military strategies, raised eyebrows. Critics will pounce, claiming it taints his judgment. But this incident, while unfortunate, doesn’t erase his decades of service or his alignment with Trump’s vision. If anything, it underscores the need for vigilance in a world where information is weaponized.

Waltz steps into a role where he’ll face a United Nations mired in dysfunction. The Security Council, hamstrung by vetoes from Moscow and Beijing, has failed to address wars in Ukraine and Gaza decisively. Meanwhile, the UN’s humanitarian efforts, while vital, are plagued by inefficiency and accusations of bias against nations like Israel. Waltz’s skepticism of multilateral institutions, honed during his congressional tenure, positions him to demand accountability and push for reforms that align with American priorities.

Republican leaders have long viewed the UN with suspicion, and for good reason. The organization’s track record includes resolutions that disproportionately target Israel while giving a pass to regimes like Iran and North Korea. In early 2025, GOP lawmakers introduced the Disengaging Entirely From the United Nations Debacle Act, a bold, if symbolic, call to rethink U.S. involvement. While total withdrawal remains unlikely, Waltz’s appointment suggests a practical step: leveraging America’s influence to reshape the UN from within.

Contrast this with the approach of those who champion the UN as a beacon of global cooperation. Advocates for robust U.S. engagement argue that withdrawing or antagonizing the UN risks isolating America and ceding influence to rivals. They’ll likely paint Waltz as a wrecking ball, undermining diplomacy for domestic political points. But this critique ignores the reality: decades of appeasement have emboldened adversaries and diluted U.S. leverage. Waltz’s mandate isn’t to dismantle the UN but to ensure it serves American interests, not undermines them.

Historical precedent supports this approach. Under President Reagan, Ambassador Jeane Kirkpatrick used her platform to challenge Soviet influence and defend U.S. values unapologetically. Waltz, with his military and legislative experience, is cut from a similar cloth. His focus on strengthening alliances, particularly with Israel, and countering threats from adversarial regimes will resonate with Americans tired of funding an institution that often bites the hand that feeds it.

Waltz’s nomination comes amid deep domestic polarization, which has bled into foreign policy. The Senate confirmation process, once a formality for qualified nominees, now risks becoming a partisan slugfest. With Republicans holding a slim majority, Waltz’s confirmation isn’t guaranteed, especially given the controversy over his recent departure from the national security advisor role. Yet, his alignment with Trump’s agenda and his extensive qualifications make him a formidable candidate to rally GOP support.

Polarization has also strained America’s global standing. Allies question whether U.S. commitments will survive the next election cycle, while adversaries exploit our divisions. Waltz’s appointment offers a chance to project stability and resolve. His military background and congressional record demonstrate a commitment to principles over politics, a rarity in today’s fractured landscape. By prioritizing bilateral alliances and selective multilateral engagement, Waltz can rebuild trust with partners while advancing Trump’s America-first vision.

Opponents will argue that Waltz’s hawkish stance and UN skepticism risk alienating allies and weakening global cooperation. They’ll claim his lack of traditional diplomatic experience makes him ill-suited for the role. But this overlooks the unique demands of the UN post under a Republican administration. The job isn’t about consensus-building; it’s about defending U.S. interests in a hostile environment. Waltz’s proven ability to navigate high-stakes national security challenges equips him to do just that.

Mike Waltz’s nomination as UN Ambassador is a bold move to reassert American leadership in a world increasingly hostile to our interests. His military valor, legislative acumen, and loyalty to Trump’s agenda make him a fitting choice to challenge the UN’s status quo. By focusing on accountability, supporting allies like Israel, and countering adversarial narratives, Waltz can steer U.S. diplomacy toward strength and clarity.

The road ahead won’t be easy. Senate confirmation, global crises, and domestic divisions will test Waltz’s resolve. But if his career is any indication, he’s ready to fight for America’s place on the world stage. This isn’t about retreating from global engagement; it’s about ensuring that engagement serves the American people first. Waltz’s tenure could mark a turning point, proving that strength, not compromise, is the key to effective diplomacy.