General Warns: Our 'Glacial' Military System Is a National Security Threat

U.S. military acquisition lags as threats soar. Ukraine’s lessons demand speed, not bureaucracy, to keep America safe.

General Warns: Our 'Glacial' Military System is a National Security Threat BreakingCentral

Published: April 9, 2025

Written by Jorge Thompson

A Wake-Up Call From the Battlefield

America’s enemies aren’t waiting. From cheap drones tearing through million-dollar defenses to hybrid threats popping up like weeds, the world’s getting uglier by the day. Army Gen. Bryan P. Fenton, head of U.S. Special Operations Command, laid it bare before Congress on April 9, 2025: the way we gear up for war is broken. He’s right. The character of conflict has flipped upside down, and we’re still lumbering along with a procurement system that moves slower than a Cold War tank. It’s not just embarrassing, it’s dangerous.

Fenton’s testimony hit like a gut punch. He’s seen 38 years of service, and he says this mess, with its asymmetric twists and lightning-fast innovation cycles, is the worst he’s ever faced. Our adversaries are churning out $10,000 kamikaze drones while we lob $2 million missiles to swat them down. That’s not a strategy, that’s a bankruptcy notice. If we don’t fix this now, we’re handing the next fight to the bad guys on a silver platter.

The Ukraine Mirror: Speed Wins Wars

Look at Ukraine. Their fight against Russia isn’t some far-off theory, it’s a live-fire lesson in what works. They’re cranking out a million drones a year, dirt-cheap and deadly, while turning commercial tech into battlefield game-changers. Fenton pointed to it directly: changes there happen in minutes, hours, days. Over here? We’re still counting years. Ukraine’s scrappy, decentralized hustle has kept them in the game against a bigger foe. Meanwhile, our bloated bureaucracy chokes on its own paperwork.

History backs this up. Vietnam and Iraq showed us how nimble enemies bleed giants dry with guerrilla tricks. Now, drones and 3D-printed weapons are the new IEDs. Ukraine’s success with unmanned boats sinking Russian ships proves it: agility trumps cash when the chips are down. Yet our Defense Department can’t shift funds between budget lines without a dozen sign-offs. That’s not preparedness, that’s paralysis.

Socom’s Plea: Cut the Fat, Arm the Fight

Fenton didn’t mince words. Socom’s mission load has spiked 35% in two years, but their budget’s flatlined. They’re stretched thin, juggling ops and upgrades while the enemy innovates daily. His fix? Slash the middlemen. Streamline the requirements process so operators and commanders talk straight to acquisition teams. Fewer hands, faster results. He’s onto something big here. The DOD’s $850 billion budget for 2025 is hefty, sure, but it’s shrinking against inflation, and acquisition costs are creeping up. We can’t afford waste.

He also wants funding flexibility, compressing those rigid budget categories into something leaner. And longer contracts, five to ten years, not two. Smart. Look at Trump’s push to review big programs, or Senator Jim Banks’ ‘Buying Faster than the Enemy Act.’ These aren’t just ideas, they’re lifelines. Industry’s ready to roll, too, with drone outfits like Shield AI proving cheap tech can outgun legacy systems. Socom needs that edge, not another decade of red tape.

The Naysayers Don’t Get It

Some will argue we can’t rush this, that cutting corners risks quality or accountability. They’ll say a slow system keeps us safe from waste or fraud. Nonsense. Ukraine’s churning out FPV drones that shred tanks for $500 a pop, while we’re still debating specs on billion-dollar boondoggles. The real waste is watching adversaries lap us because we’re too scared to move. Oversight’s fine, but when it strangles action, it’s the enemy’s best friend.

Others might claim budgets can’t stretch further, pointing to post-2008 cuts and rising ops costs. Tough. Asymmetric warfare doesn’t care about excuses. Drones have flipped the cost-benefit game, three to four times more accurate than human pilots, per Shield AI’s data. We’ve shifted $50 billion to these systems for a reason. It’s not about spending more, it’s about spending right, and fast.

Time to Act, Not Debate

Fenton’s laid out the stakes: a ‘glacial’ system in a supersonic world. We’re not just behind, we’re vulnerable. Ukraine’s shown us the blueprint, history’s taught us the cost of lagging, and Socom’s begging for the tools to win. This isn’t about politics or pet projects. It’s about keeping America safe when threats come out of nowhere and hit hard.

The fix isn’t rocket science. Slash the bureaucracy, free up funding, lock in long-term deals. Give our forces the gear they need before the next war starts, not after. Lawmakers and Pentagon brass need to quit stalling and start moving. Every day we don’t, the gap widens, and our enemies cheer. Let’s get this done.